When doctor’s hate informed patients

A doctor, Scott Haig, published an essay in time magazine titled “When the Patient is a Googler” on November 8. The doctor describes a prospective patient who is “well spoken and in good shape, an attractive woman in her mid-40s.” He then says that she “launched into me with a barrage of excrutiatingly well-informed questions.”

In the course of the essay, Dr. Haig describes Susan’s child as a “little monster” and her as a “brainsucker.” He says patients like Susan are full of “half-baked ideas” and are suspicious and distrustful. He also says that patients like Susan are full of “misused, mispronounced words and half-baked ideas” (what happened to her being “well spoken” and informed?) He knew these things about patients like Susan not because of anything she said (she was well spoken, after all) but because “a seasoned doc gets good at sizing up what kind of patient he’s got.” He decides not to treat Susan but to refer her to another doctor. When he declined to treat her, he says she was “disappointed and annoyed,” but she already had an appointment with the doctor he planned to suggest.

It is obvious to anyone but the doctor that she was vetting prospective doctors just as he was vetting prospective patients. It may be that knowledgeable patients get good at sizing up what kind of doctor they have. Based on the essay, her questions were a good way to ferret out a megalomaniacal doctor who could not handle a patient who may know a little too much. He asks whether such patients exist in countries where doctors are in short supply. It is possible that Susan is a selfish prig who wants everything in life on her own terms.

It does not appear, however, that Dr. Haig is one of those doctors who travels to a war-torn country to give his services to those who need them most. Nor does it appear that Dr. Haig has any humility in the face of patients who may know more about their own pain than he. Susan isn’t the only patient Dr. Haig doesn’t like, you see. He describes others as “non-compliant Bozos.” This is a doctor who gives orders and expects them to be followed.

Paternalism, indeed, is not dead.

About ethicsbeyondcompliance

I hold a PhD in medical humanities with an major emphasis in ethics. I began teaching college-level ethics in 2000.
This entry was posted in bioethics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to When doctor’s hate informed patients

  1. Brianna says:

    I would be dead many times over had I blindly listened to my Doctors. One of whom sent me home with internal bleeding under my protests telling me that I just wanted to stay in the hospital, and one who repeatedly failed to diagnose anemia then gave incorrect instructions on how much iron is a therapeutic dose. I finally diagnosed myself and demanded two other tests to rule out aspergillus poisoning and thyroid problems and by that time my gums were white and my skin was grey. And the list goes on and on. I thank God for Dr. Google. I will never again blindly trust any Doctor. I will be proactive and informed and I will happily advocate for myself and scream like hell if I need to in order to get appropriate treatment. And happily fire any doctor who can not be a partner in my treatment. They work for ME I do not work for them. And I pay them a hell of a lot of money I deserve to be treated with respect and compassion and to receive competent treatment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s